Tara Reade’s Updated Medium Post: All Material Edits

4/29/20 Corrections:
Reade made the new allegations public on March 24th, not the 26th
The “datemodified” in the source code indicates the most recent edit

5/8/20 Correction: Reade most recently shared her original post on March 15th, not in February

(Note: My goal is to make this article 100% reproducible and verifiable. All sources are public and can easily be checked.)

In April of 2019, Alexandra Tara Reade (formerly McCabe) wrote on Medium about her experience with Joe Biden. At this time, she was alleging inappropriate contact of a non-sexual nature – one of several women to come forward about Biden’s “handsy” behavior.

On March 24, 2020, Reade went public with a sexual assault allegation against Joe Biden. Given this was an addition to her prior account, her post on Medium underwent some level of scrutiny. To be absolutely clear: simply coming forward with new information is not “changing her story”. Abuse victims will often speak up about their experiences in different pieces. This is not abnormal.

However, retroactively editing prior statements IS changing her story. Upon inspection of the webpage’s source code, it appears Reade has done exactly that. On March 24th – the day she brought her new allegations against Biden – Reade edited her original post on Medium. The post maintained its April 2019 date, making the article look like her updates were part of the original. These updates added significant new information.

Source Code: The Article was Edited

Her Medium post can be found here. Opening the source code (a simple right-click in Chrome) allows us to view some basic metadata. Below is the segment of interest, with the relevant pieces bolded in red.

{"@context":"http:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","image":["https:\u002F\u002Fmiro.medium.com\u002Fmax\u002F1200\u002F1*tjv0UwpefrXTe5YmcCXmrw@2x.jpeg"],"url":"https:\u002F\u002Fmedium.com\u002F@AlexandraTaraReade\u002Fa-girl-walks-into-the-senate-dd9ebdfce31b","dateCreated":"2019-04-06T18:56:32.009Z","datePublished":"2019-04-06T18:56:32.009Z","dateModified":"2020-03-24T22:18:47.379Z","headline":"A Girl Walks into the Senate… - Alexandra Tara Reade, J.D. - Medium","name":"A Girl Walks into the Senate… - Alexandra Tara Reade, J.D. - Medium"

In other words, the source code indicates that the article was edited as recently as March 24th.

Traditional internet archives (such as the Wayback Machine) do not have this article stored before March 26th, 2020. Normally, this would stop us from viewing any old versions of the article. However, The Union also posted Reade’s article in April of 2019. This allows us to compare the original post to Reade’s updated version.

The original, never modified version can be found here – published by The Union on April 17, 2019. Reade tweeted this article the very next day, and explicitly confirmed it was a correct accounting of her story a few days later. Reade continued to share the original as recently as March 15 – just 9 days before bringing her new allegations against Biden.

List of Edits

Original: https://www.theunion.com/opinion/columns/alexandra-tara-reade-a-girl-walks-into-the-senate/
Updated: https://medium.com/@AlexandraTaraReade/a-girl-walks-into-the-senate-dd9ebdfce31b

Below I have listed the segments of the article that were materially altered, roughly in order of importance (from most to least impactful).

Wording removed in the update will be red, italicized, and struck through
Wording added in the update will be red and bolded

  • “But this is not only a story about sexual misconduct”
  • “I am upset now and feel defensive. Again, somehow me talking about what happened, what Joe Biden did to me, is my fault. And I did not even tell the whole story…The small portion that did come out of what Joe Biden did to me resulted in me being bullied and threatened to silence.
  • “Maybe as women, we can speak up at the time and not lose our jobs or reputations if our boundaries are violated. Maybe these men can modify their behavior or at least let them be held accountable. There needs to be restorative justice for victims who lose their jobs due to sexual harassment and assault. Maybe we can start from there.”
  • “Then, I went to Senate Personnel for help. No one helped me. I was moved into a solitary, windowless office and told to leave. I resigned or I would say, I was fired, or should I say, I was forced to resign. I was told to look for another job. No one would interview me on the Hill for any position.
  • “What started with promise and possibility, ended because some prominent Senator decided that he liked my legs and objectified me. I was sad and lost and moved on. My career on the Hill was over.”
  • “I believe these gestures were not so much about “connection” but establishing dominance in the room and power over others.”
  • “I was told that Senator Biden wanted me to “serve drinks at an event with some donors (all men) because he “liked my legs” and thought I was “pretty.” These “events” were often all older, wealthy males.

(there are also a variety of immaterial changes to spelling and punctuation)

What this all means is up to you. But this much is clear: In the same day she accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, Tara Reade edited her previous statements to better match her new allegations.

49 thoughts on “Tara Reade’s Updated Medium Post: All Material Edits

      1. I was trying to sift through people posting the edits and such on Twitter while not having an account there and it was a mess. I saw a comment on Reddit linking your post here and you’ve summed it all up cleanly while being accurate and I happened to have an old
        unused account here 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

      2. FYI. Australia’s public broadcaster ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corp.) has a dedicated 24hr TV news channel on free-to-air and a niche program called Planet America that specialises in US news. As it turns out, one of the show’s presenters has made much the same discovery about Tara Reade editing (or significantly re-writing) her 2019 Medium article AFTER its publication date without declaring the alterations. Planet America also found the dodgy editing in the source code.

        The presenter, Chas Licciardello is a straight-up, reputable guy and I’m pretty sure that he found the anomaly in the Medium piece without being aware of your article above. If he had seen your piece he would have cited it (and brought it up long before now). I’ll bring your article to his attention tonight (Australian time). Anyhow, I thought you’d be interested to know about that, and to see Licciardello’s segment on Planet America (20th of May 2020 episode) which is available on the ABC’s website here:

        https://iview.abc.net.au/show/planet-america?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIhPuJnM_O6QIVzWkqCh3HwQLyEAAYASAAEgKXe_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

        And on Facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/abcplanetamerica/

        Having seen both pieces and Clifford MacArthur’s article (which links yours in section 1):

        View at Medium.com

        I am surprised that you, Liciardello and Clifford aren’t all making more of a fuss about this particular discovery.The re-editing caper of Reade’s goes beyond her extensive record of inconsistency and raises questions about fraudulent and calculated dishonesty.

        Marco

        NSW, Australia

        Like

      3. Recent investigations by CNN and Politico revealed that Reade never actually received her university degree, meaning she has lied under oath in court proceedings where she served as an expert witness based in part on having a valid degree. This has led to her lawyer dropping her as a client. If Reade is willing to lie under oath, she presumably would be OK with lying in other instances.

        Reade will be forgotten by next month as the Trump campaign desperately searches for something else to tarnish Biden with.

        Like

  1. While I believe all allegations should be investigated by credible sources, I’ve questioned why this allegation wasn’t disclosed in 2008 when he was selected as VP.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Things have changed a lot – the last few years have felt like forever. There was no MeToo movement in 2008 – Reade may have had no idea where to go.

      I don’t think these allegations are true, but I give Reade the benefit of the doubt on that specific piece (not coming out in 2008).

      What I don’t understand is her liking/retweeting content about Biden’s work against sexual assault. That’s not consistent at all.

      Liked by 4 people

  2. “Then, I went to Senate Personnel for help. No one helped me. I was moved into a solitary, windowless office and told to leave. I resigned or I would say, I was fired, or should I say, I was forced to resign. I was told to look for another job. No one would interview me on the Hill for any position.”

    Interesting…

    “No one would interview me on the Hill for any position.”

    Does this mean there is a black list with Tara’s name on it? Wouldn’t this be easy to corroborate for Tara to find somebody on the hill to say that she was indeed black listed?

    Like

    1. I doubt anybody would corroborate it, it’s like Kaepernick in the NFL – the whole point of blackballing someone is keeping it secret.

      I think the truth is probably that she was uncomfortable with Biden’s “handsy” behavior, and complaining about it made her unpopular. With Biden being such a high-profile Senator at the time, maybe other officials didn’t want to go near her.

      That’s an upsetting story, and she was definitely wronged. But it’s not even close to sexual assault.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Interesting, I read her original post as well and even though I’m very particular about spelling, punctuation and content, I don’t think I would have realized just how much of a difference those few changes would have made had I not read the original.

    I’m of the same mind as those who wondered why this never came up when he was vetted as VP and served so well for those 8 years. I’m not prescient, but as soon as I read her post I truly felt something was “off.”

    Thank you so much for the time you took to update this.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. The additions constitute an expansion of the original post. Nothing added in red is a reversal of what was originally written. Also, your line that the original allegations were of a “non-sexual nature” is not supported by Reade’s use of sexual misconduct in the original post.

    You are desperate and seeing what you wish to. There is nothing surprising about someone editing the post before going public, knowing that one’s earlier statements would be surfaced. If she had deleted the post, you might have something worth investigating. As it is, nothing.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. As originally written, Reade declared “But this is not a story about sexual misconduct.” Are you saying Reade viewed Biden’s actions as sexual in nature, but not misconduct? Now she’s altered that line to assert that it *was* sexual misconduct, which is a change of position.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. >Reade declared “But this is not a story about sexual misconduct.”
        The whole sentence reads:
        But this is not a story about sexual misconduct; it is a story about abuse of power.
        She is making a distinction that has been feminist boilerplate since Susan Brownmiller (so 1975 say):
        that rape (and by extension sexual assault) is a crime of violence, not sex.
        She is distinguishing what happened from, say, an extra-marital office affair.

        The edit doesn’t materially change her story. Rather it merely wordsmiths away a possible (and possibly hostile) misreading.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Reade used the term “sexual misconduct” in the phrase “… this is NOT about sexual misconduct…”
      Why do you claim she “used” the term, as if she was making a positive statement. I I stated someone did not lie, you you somehow infer that person lied because I used “lie” in a sentence.

      Having read at lease a dozen of Reade’s essays and twitter posts, I’m convinced she is a narcissist. She views herself as a perpetually wronged crusader, and her posts about Putin are downright bizarre.

      She really craves attention and power — after all she, herself, proclaims her desire to be the “alpha” in the room.

      When Blasey Ford came forward, she simply told her truth, with no demands or judgments. Reade clearly is enjoying the spotlight, and wants to change the world — not simply tell her personal story and let people make their own decision..

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Why hasn’t she come forward sooner? We’ll that exactly is what Me too was about and why it was so important. Why hasn’t Ford come forward sooner?

      They finally felt supported and safe enough, because of me too?
      Also: this changing of stories is very normal for victims of abuse, because they are very ashamed and frightened, and as it goes on and they find support they will start to open up and bold enough to say what actually happened.

      Also: this was a Long Time ago, and as you deal with it as a victim, you will sharpen your recount of the events.

      Please be civil. And there’s is a lot of reason to seriously examine this, if you look at it unbiased.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Hilarious.
    If a woman accuses a Republican, no matter how ludicrous her story or how much it changes or even if there is not only zero evidence to support it but the very people she claims are corroborating witnesses refute her claims, she must be believed and treated as a saint.

    But if a woman accuses a Dem, then shaming her, noting every change in the story or inconsistency and a profound skepticism is not only morally right it’s our civic duty. Suddenly due process matters not unsupported innuendo and by God we should look at every accusation with a jaundiced eye rather than mindlessly believing whatever an accuser says.

    Unfortunately for the Dems, in this case the edited version of events seems to coincide with the one she told five different people at the time it happened.
    But my dear feminist friends just can’t comprehend why, if what he alleges is true, she might have been a little reluctant to be forthcoming after one of the most powerful people in the country assaulted her and his staff subsequently pressured her to shut up and go away.
    Nor are they even slightly troubled why the noble Joe refuses to even allow a search through his archives of a search limited to only one name Tara Reade.

    I don’t know for a fact whether what she said is true but I do know you people are sickening in your hypocrisy and feigned moral outrage that turns on a dime depending on whose ox is being gored.

    Like

    1. Hmm… why are you defending Republicans?

      And in what way is posting Tara Reade’s OWN WORDS “shaming her”?

      Oh and go fuck yourself

      Liked by 1 person

    2. If you’re not willing to hold Trump accountable for the two dozen women who accuse him of sexual assault (including one who says she was 13 years old when Trump raped her at Jeffrey Epstein’s house), and that he bragged about on tape, your concern here comes across as dishonest. No Republican should open their mouth about this. If you’re a Sanders supporter, fine, but you don’t come across as one (“Dems”). Not that Bernie is spotless in this area, either. What’s worse, one instance of sexual assault, or ignoring an atmosphere of discrimination and harassment at the organization you are in charge of?

      Biden’s archives at the U. of Delaware wouldn’t mention Reade as personnel records are not included in a legislative record. And now Reade is backtracking on the complaint she says she filed with Congress, saying that it doesn’t mention sexual assault.

      Biden essentially called Reade a liar, so she has a cause of action to sue him for defamation of character, like Summer Zervos is suing your hero Trump. Let’s see if she actually does that.

      But I’m willing to make a deal. Biden and Trump can both drop out, and the contest can be between Liz Warren and Mike Pence. If you’re not willing to confront your own hypocrisy, you can STFU.

      Liked by 2 people

    3. And your arrogant hypocrisy and false representation of how women are treated differently depending on whether the men accused are Dems are Repubs is horse manure…you’re too partisan, to put it politely..

      Like

    4. You are making a LOT of innuendo claims here that needs to be supported. Do you have links to back up ANY of your claims?

      Sexual assault allegations deserve to be taken seriously and investigated honestly, regardless of who the claim is against or their party affiliation. If you are asserting that the GOP have a better track record than Dems, show your proof.

      I would like to see an updated response from you… with links to support what you still claim since you wrote this over 3 weeks ago and things have… evolved. If you have stayed abreast of the updates, I think you may well have changed your opinion on the rest of your comments.

      Like

    5. All allegations aren’t equal. We’re looking at Reade’s story, and it’s full of holes. It’s not hypocrisy to point that out.

      I assume you weren’t planning on voting for Biden regardless of whether Reade had come forward or not. I opposed Kavanaugh’s nomination for other reasons, too. Ford’s allegations were just icing on the cake.

      Like

  6. It’s amazing republican’s will always paint their candidate as second to the pope will morals everyone else is devil in disquise !

    Like

    1. Someone said that the dress codes for Congress at the time would have meant she was almost surely wearing pantyhose. I don’t know if that is correct or not… Just another thing to consider that if it is, then her description doesn’t account for that.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Ouch, another reason the story doesn’t work….she was not a tiny woman — she cldn’t push hi
        m away??

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Apparently, it just came out that her lawyer is a big Trump contributor… hm… well… that shouldn’t mean anything (although today, I’m not so sure)!

        Like

    1. LOL! She changed her story to say Biden did sexually assault her. She edited her old post to change the wording from “.. not about sexual assault” to “.. not ONLY about sexual assault”. That is editing to better match the new allegations…

      Like

  7. Only people who watch no news except Fox think feminists only believe women who claim Republicans sexually assault them. Quite recently Al Franken was kicked out of Congress on that charge, for example, and way back when Bill Clinton was impeached because of sexual misconduct. And of course POTUS lies even when he doesn’t have to so God knows what HE has claimed to be true.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Don’t forget about good ol’ John Edwards or Anthony Weiner! Yes, Democrats absolutely will throw out one of their own if the allegations are true, or are likely to be true.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Not to mention all of the Hollywood and media figures (Woody Allen, Harvey Weinstein, Charlie Rose, Matt Lauer, etc.) who are big Democrats.

        Like

    2. Toni, thank you for the PERFECT comeback!! We sat through all the M Lewinsky/Ken Starr crap, all the innuendo @ Clinton et al, while at the same time, how many Repub Governors, Senators and others were getting away with harassment and more??

      Like

  8. Thank you so much for your hard work here. To the people who say this does not contradict the sexual assault allegation she came forth with in March of this year? You’re wrong.
    Let me explain:
    She voluntarily told “The Union” in April 2019 that she didn’t feel like the actions toward her were sexualization and likened it to being like a lamp. https://www.theunion.com/news/local-news/nevada-county-woman-says-joe-biden-inappropriately-touched-her-while-working-in-his-u-s-senate-office/
    When people asked her about this later she said she felt shut down by the reporter. That’s understandable.
    That was the only interview with Ms Reade from April 2019 that had been published.
    However, it turns out she also spoke with the AP and Washington Post in April 2019 ( they had declined to publish her first story, which is that Biden made her uncomfortable with his handsiness).
    Recently, both papers have published what she told them at the time.
    According to the Washington Post:
    “In The Post interview last year, she laid more blame with Biden’s staff for “bullying” her than with Biden.

    “This is what I want to emphasize: It’s not him. It’s the people around him who keep covering for him,” Reade said, adding later, “For instance, he should have known what was happening to me. . . . Looking back now, that’s my criticism. Maybe he could have been a little more in touch with his own staff.”
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sexual-assault-allegation-by-former-biden-senate-aide-emerges-in-campaign-draws-denial/2020/04/12/bc070d66-7067-11ea-b148-e4ce3fbd85b5_story.html

    According to the AP she said:
    “During one of the April 2019 interviews with the AP, she said Biden rubbed her shoulders and neck and played with her hair. She said she was asked by an aide in Biden’s Senate office to dress more conservatively and told “don’t be so sexy.”

    She said of Biden: “I wasn’t scared of him, that he was going to take me in a room or anything. It wasn’t that kind of vibe.”
    ….
    “According to a transcript of her 2019 interview with the AP, Reade said: “They have this counseling office or something, and I think I walked in there once, but then I chickened out.” She made a similar statement in a second interview with AP that same day, according to written notes from the interview.”
    (That contradicts her numerous tweets post 2019 where she’s said she filed an official complaint with Senate Personnel for sexual harassment “and more”. But I digress).
    https://apnews.com/aec7beb03e9e0e0e6e3c58111293e0ea

    The point is, she voluntarily wrote on her blog and stated to 3 separate reporters information that is exculpatory for Biden. Survivors often have a hard time sharing details of their assault but they don’t come right out and say things like “It WASN’T sexual misconduct” “It WASN’T sexualization” etc. That is, things that EXONERATE the accused.

    Anyway great job. I think she’s a troubled woman who is being exploited right now. Her story never should have been published because now she’s dealing with terrible scrutiny and harassment.

    By the way, two other reasons I don’t believe her story are:
    – Location
    There are no semi-private areas in the Capital complex where it could have occurred. Therefore she’s alleging Biden assaulted her basically in public, in an area teeming with foot traffic, right in the middle of the biggest sexual harassment scandal in Senate history (1993 was the Bob Packwood Sexual Harassment scandal – that itself is an interesting fact) and 2 years after Biden screwed up the Anita Hill thing? Yeah sure.
    – Her mom liked Biden’s Facebook!
    https://www.facebook.com/jeanette.altimus/likes?lst=100024153017869%3A1765517435%3A1588056073
    She may have been assaulted in the past but I don’t buy it was Biden and I’m 100% sure she lied when she said she told her mom. If you listen to the Larry King call it sure doesn’t sound like a mom talking about her daughter’s rapist either (“out of respect for the Senator”). WTF.
    It sounds exactly like the story she first described in her blog (as you’ve noted) & which she told to 3 different reporters. It’s also consistent with all those pro Biden tweets on her old account (especially the one praising him for his work on combating Sexual Assault) and the version of events her brother told Washington Post and ABC (before he changed his story to fit better with the sexual assault allegation). Oh and corroborating witnesses (none of which are contemporaneous by the way) are only as credible as the person giving them information. That story about Christine O’Donnell’s niece had 6 corroborating witnesses and it was proven DEFINITELY to be untrue (Biden wasn’t at the event either year)
    Occams Razor people!

    Liked by 1 person

  9. And, I understand her story now is an exact replication of a story her father wrote years ago – – – in other words pure fiction.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s